Puntland has rejected the constitutional amendments, arguing that they were made without proper consultation and violate the principles of federalism. The regional government claims that the amendments undermine its sovereignty and threaten the unity of Somalia.
In response, Puntland has declared that it will govern independently until a nationwide referendum ensures a fair constitutional process. This stance increases tensions between Puntland and the federal government.
Reasons Behind Puntland’s Opposition to Provisional Constitution Revisions
Puntland argues that 80% of the interim constitutional amendments were made without proper consultation with federal member states. The region fears that the amendments could undermine its 25-year autonomy and centralize power in Mogadishu, contradicting Somalia’s federal structure.
Potential Impact of Provisional Constitution Revisions on Federalism
If implemented, the temporary constitutional revision could transfer 60 percent of legislative power to the federal government, reducing the influence of regional states. This could increase political instability, with at least three federal member states expressing concern about the changes.
Puntland’s Next Steps After Rejecting Provisional Constitution Revisions
Puntland has declared a temporary independent administration, cutting ties with Mogadishu rule until 70 percent of stakeholders approve constitutional amendments through a national referendum. The region has also warned of potential economic and security changes affecting more than 4 million residents.
Puntland’s rejection of the interim constitutional amendment highlights deep tensions over federalism and governance in Somalia. The lack of broad consultation and concerns about centralization of power have led Puntland to push for greater autonomy. A negotiated, inclusive constitutional process is essential to prevent further political fragmentation.
