Israeli media have reported that most provisions of U.S. President Donald Trump’s proposed peace plan for Gaza are acceptable to Israel.
However, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is reportedly considering adjustments to certain key clauses.
According to Yedioth Ahronoth, citing Israeli officials and sources close to Netanyahu, “Israel’s initial assessment suggests that the majority of Trump’s Gaza initiative is in line with Israeli interests.
Yet, Netanyahu is working to modify some elements before giving full approval.”
Background on Trump’s Previous Peace Initiatives
Donald Trump’s administration launched several Middle East peace efforts between 2017 and 2021, most notably the “Deal of the Century” and the Abraham Accords.
While the Abraham Accords normalized relations between Israel and several Arab states, Trump’s peace plan for Gaza focuses specifically on ending hostilities and addressing humanitarian issues in the enclave.
Including this historical context highlights how the current plan fits into a broader U.S. strategy.
Key Points of Trump’s Peace Plan for Gaza
Sources noted that Netanyahu opposes the closure of Gaza’s relief agency and is willing to support prisoner exchanges, including the release of inmates serving life sentences.
However, he is not prepared to free high-profile figures such as Marwan Barghouti.
The plan reportedly outlines specific details.
For example, after the release of all Israeli captives, Israel would free 250 prisoners serving life terms in addition to 1,700 Gaza residents detained after October 7.
In return, Israel would also release the remains of 15 Palestinians for each deceased Israeli prisoner returned.
Read also: Somali President Calls for Urgent Action at UNGA 80 to Stop Violence in Palestine
Israeli Public and Political Reactions
Inside Israel, reactions to Trump’s peace plan for Gaza plan are mixed.
Supporters argue it could reduce security risks and improve the humanitarian situation, while critics warn that large prisoner releases could embolden militant groups.
Analysts note that Netanyahu’s push for amendments reflects his need to balance domestic political pressures with international diplomacy.
How About Netanyahu’s Negotiation Strategy
Yedioth Ahronoth stated that Netanyahu is currently introducing revisions to Trump’s peace plan for Gaza.
Israeli officials believe a final agreement could be reached before October 7, although its full implementation may extend until the end of the year.
Earlier reports from the newspaper indicated that Hamas is expected to demand the release of prominent Palestinian leaders currently imprisoned in Israel as part of a prisoner swap deal proposed in July.
This list includes high-profile figures such as Fatah leader Marwan Barghouti, Ahmad Sa’adat of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, and senior Hamas member Abdullah Barghouti.
International and Regional Reactions
Regional powers such as Egypt, Qatar and Jordan have historically played a role in mediating between Israel and Palestinian factions.
Their stance on Trump’s peace plan for Gaza will be critical to its success.
European and UN officials have also signaled interest in supporting any agreement that reduces tensions and improves humanitarian access.
Palestinian Perspective and Expected Demands
On the Palestinian side, Hamas and other factions are expected to press for the release of prominent leaders and long-term prisoners.
Observers believe the inclusion or exclusion of figures like Marwan Barghouti could be a decisive factor in whether the plan is accepted by Palestinian negotiators.
Humanitarian and Security Implications
If implemented, Trump’s peace plan for Gaza could lead to a significant influx of aid and reconstruction funds into Gaza, potentially easing living conditions for civilians.
At the same time, Israel’s security establishment is evaluating how large-scale releases and border policy changes might affect its long-term security.
Timeline and Implementation Challenges
Even if a deal is reached, analysts warn that the timeline for implementation could stretch well beyond the end of the year due to logistical and political hurdles.
Monitoring mechanisms, verification of prisoner releases, and the rebuilding of Gaza’s infrastructure would all require detailed coordination between multiple stakeholders.
